Legal Opinion

Matson Terminals, Inc. v. California Employment Commission

California Supreme Court

Decided August 18, 1944No. S. F. 16840PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, J.

The petitioners, a number of steamship and stevedoring companies that are employers within the meaning of the California Unemployment Insurance Act (Stats. 1935, ch. 352, as amended; Deering’s Gen. Laws, Act 8780d), seek a writ of mandamus to prevent enforcement of an order of the California Employment Commission awarding unemployment insurance benefits to a group of longshoremen, interveners herein.

The petitioners operate pier and terminal facilities in the San Francisco Bay area and are associated together in an incorporated, nonprofit association, the Waterfront Employers’ Association of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Abelleira v. District Court of AppealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Bodinson Manufacturing Co. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Baldwin v. Scott County Milling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  4. Jersey City Printing Co. v. CassidyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1902
  5. White v. City of AlamedaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. Whitcomb Hotel, Inc. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Empire Star Mines Co. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Nordling v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  4. General Motors Corporation v. MulquinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1947
  5. Bell-Brook Dairies, Inc. v. BryantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API