Legal Opinion

Gardner v. Director of Employment

California Supreme Court

Decided November 10, 1959No. S. F. 19975PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchauer, J.

This mandamus proceeding comes before us on appeal by defendant State of California and defendant employers from a judgment of the superior court ordering defendant state to pay petitioners unemployment insurance benefits. The judgment sets aside a decision of the California Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board which denied such benefits to the petitioners. We have concluded that defendants are correct in their contention that by reason of the provisions of section 1262 of the Unemployment Insurance Code1 as heretofore construed and applied by this court petitioners are not, on the record…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Bodinson Manufacturing Co. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Cole v. RushCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Bunny's Waffle Shop, Inc. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Thomas v. California Employment Stabilization CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  5. McKinley v. California Employment Stabilization CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Interstate Brands v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  2. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. KyleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Brotherhood of Teamsters & Auto Truck Drivers, Local No. 70 v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  4. Pacific Maritime Ass'n v. California Unemployment Insurance Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  5. Coast Packing Co. v. California Unemployment Insurance Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API