United States v. Schade
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtHatfield, Judge
Merchandise, described in the invoice as “cod liver oil cake meal” and bought and sold in the trade of the United States as “cod-liver oil-cake meal” and sometimes as “cod-liver meal” and “cod-liver oil meal,” was assessed for duty by the collector at the port of Norfolk, Va., at 20 per centum ad valorem as a nonenumerated manufactured article under paragraph 1459 of the Tariff Act of 1922, which reads as follows:
Par. 1459. That there shall be levied, collected, and paid on the importation of all raw or unmanufactured articles not enumerated or provided for, a duty of *36710 per centum ad valorem,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Maddock v. MagoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- United States v. Lilly & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
- Brown v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
- United States v. WalterCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
- Hamfton v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- United States v. Ellis Silver Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1929
- Borneo Sumatra Trading Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
- New York Merchandise Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1946
- Heads & Threads, Division of MSL Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
- United States v. Geo. S. Bush & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.