Legal Opinion

Brown v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided December 6, 1915No. 1553PublishedCited by 28 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, G. A. 7689 (T. D. 35143).

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, Judge

Merchandise imported at the port of Neiv York was classified by the collector of customs as beans, prepared or preserved, in tins, jars, bottles, or similar packages.. The importation was accordingly assessed for duty at 1 cent per pound, including the weight of the coverings, under the provisions of paragraph 199 of the tariff act of 1913, which, in so far as it is pertinent to the case, reads as follows:

199. Beans, * * * prepared or preserved, or contained in tins, jars, bottles, or similar packages, including the weight of immediate coverings, 1 cent per pound; * * *.

The importers…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Chew Hing Lung v. WiseSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Arthur v. LaheySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Vietor v. ArthurSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  4. Brennan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1905
  5. Neuman v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. United States v. SchadeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  2. United States v. La MannaCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  3. Quong Lee v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1942
  4. Nootka Packing Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1935
  5. Tower & Sons v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1921

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API