Legal Opinion

United States v. Ellis Silver Co.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided February 27, 1929No. 3140PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHatfield, Judge

Merchandise, consisting of flower and fruit bowls, bonbon dishes, candlesticks, chamber candlesticks, candelabras, vegetable dishes, and many other articles, each in chief value of base metal and plated with silver, was assessed for duty by the collector at the port of New York as articles or wares plated with silver at 60 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 399 of the Tariff Act of 1922.

The merchandise is claimed by the importer to be dutiable as table and household utensils, or as hollow ware, at 40 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 339.

Paragraphs 399 and 339 read as follows:

Pae. 399.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. SchadeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  2. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
  3. Sittig v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Ross Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959
  2. Fan Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1950
  3. Ignaz Strauss & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1942
  4. Ignaz Strauss & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
  5. United States v. Baltimore & Ohio R.R. Co. a/c United China & Glass Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1959

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API