Hamfton v. United States
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtGraham, Presiding Judge
The entries in this case were four in number, made at various dates on and after September 29, 1922. Entry No. 3185 described the merchandise as 1,476 crates asbestos shingles; the corresponding invoice described the same as "starters,” and “slates,” of various sizes and colors. Entry No. 3659 described the merchandise as “three hundred cases asbestos sheets,” and the invoice as “sheets,” of various sizes. Entry No. 4221 described the merchandise as “2,662 crates asbestos shingles,” and the invoice described it as “shingles,” “starters,” and “ridges” of various sizes and colors. Entry No.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Maddock v. MagoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Chew Hing Lung v. WiseSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- The MargaretSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- United States v. WalterCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
- Knauth v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- United States v. SchadeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
- United States v. StoneCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
- New York Merchandise Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1946
- United States v. Briggs Manufacturing Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
- Burgess Battery Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1947
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.