Legal Opinion

United States v. Lilly & Co.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided January 21, 1927No. 2739PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGraham, Presiding Judge

The articles imported in this case are denominated as ampoules by the importers. The collector classified them as vials holding less than one-fourth of a pint under paragraph 217 of the Tariff Act of 1922, which is as follows:

Par. 217. Plain green or colored, molded or pressed, and flint, lime, or lead-glass bottles, vials, jars, and covered or uncovered demijohns, and carboys, any of the foregoing, filled or unfilled, not specially provided for, and whether their contents be dutiable or free (except such as contain merchandise subject to an ad valorem rate of duty, or to a rate of duty based…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. MescallSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  2. In re San Gabriel Sanatorium Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1899
  3. Morimura Bros. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  4. Overton & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
  5. Burlington Venetian Blind Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Fan Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1950
  2. United States v. SchadeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  3. United States v. Bassichis Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  4. New York Merchandise Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1946
  5. Heads & Threads, Division of MSL Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API