United States v. Walter
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, G. A. 7396 (T. D. 32871).
1Opinion of the CourtBarber, Judge
The merchandise here is known as ladder tapes, and is identical with that before this court in Burlington Venetian Blind Co. v. *96United States (1 Ct. Cust. Appls., 374; T. D. 31456), and United States v. Burlington Venetian Blind Co. (3 Ct. Cust. Appls., 378; T. D. 32967).
In the earlier of these cases the issue as to the classification of the merchandise was between the provisions of paragraph 349 and paragraph 332 of the tariff act of 1909. The importer claimed that the articles were dutiable as manufactures of cotton under paragraph 332; that under the doctrino of noscitur a sociis it should…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. Burlington Venetian Blind Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
- Acker v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
- United States v. Kwong Yuen ShingCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1910
- Burlington Venetian Blind Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
3Cited by25 opinions
- United States v. SchadeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
- Hamfton v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
- United States v. MacyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
- New York Merchandise Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1946
- United States v. Briggs Manufacturing Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.