United States v. Geo. S. Bush & Co.
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtBland, Judge
The imported merchandise herein, the classification of which is in controversy, in two of the protests involves the whole of dogfish, ground into meal, and in the other two protests the merchandise consists of the entire dogfish, pressed into a more or less cake form. The merchandise in cake form was classified by the collector as “Waste, not specially provided for,” under paragraph 1457 of the Tariff Act of 1922, at 10 per centum ad valorem, while the meal was classified as a nonenumerated, wholly or partly manufactured article, under para*407graph 1459 of said act, at 20 per centum ad valorem.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. SchadeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
- Willits & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1923
- Tower & Sons v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1922
3Cited by9 opinions
- Tower v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956
- Studner v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
- A. N. Deringer, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
- Ricks v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1943
- United States v. Geo. S. Bush & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1936
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.