Legal Opinion

New York Merchandise Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided May 13, 1946No. C. D. 1003PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lawren.ce, Judge:

The question, submitted for our determination is whether so-called “kristal star lamps” are properly dutiable at the rate of 45 per centum ad valorem under the provision in paragraph 397 of the Tariff Act of 1930 for articles or wares not specially provided for, composed wholly or in chief value of metal, as classified by the collector; or, at the rate of 20 per centum ad valorem under the provision in paragraph 229 of said act for “incandescent electric-light bulbs and lamps”; or, alternatively, at the rate of 35 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 353 of said act as parts…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. New York Merchandise Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1942
  2. United States v. Lilly & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
  3. United States v. SchadeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  4. United States v. WalterCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
  5. Hamfton v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Gallagher & Ascher Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  2. New York Merchandise Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  3. Davies v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  4. F. B. Vandegrift & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
  5. Protest 66239-K of New York Merchandise Co.United States Customs Court · 1946

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API