Legal Opinion

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Lawrence

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 2011No. OSB 08-115; SC S058778PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

The issue in this lawyer disciplinary proceeding is whether the accused, by releasing a partial transcript of a juvenile hearing to the press, violated Rule of Professional Conduct (RPC) 8.4(a)(4), which prohibits a lawyer from engaging in conduct that is prejudicial to the administration of justice. A trial panel found the accused guilty of violating RPC 8.4(a)(4) and suspended him for 60 days. We review the decision of the trial panel de novo. ORS 9.536(2); BR 10.6. Because we conclude that the Bar failed to prove by clear and convincing evidence that the accused’s conduct caused prejudice…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of EadieOregon Supreme Court · 2001
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HawsOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State Ex Rel. Oregonian Publishing Co. v. DeizOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of KlugeOregon Supreme Court · 2003
  5. In Re MorrisOregon Supreme Court · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re MaurerOregon Supreme Court · 2018
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of CariniOregon Supreme Court · 2013
  3. In re ArdOregon Supreme Court · 2021
  4. In re ErsoffOregon Supreme Court · 2026
  5. In re ErsoffOregon Supreme Court · 2026

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API