Legal Opinion

In Re Morris

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 1998No. OSB 94-11; SC S43700PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

In this lawyer disciplinary proceeding, the Oregon State Bar (the Bar) charges the accused with violating the following disciplinary rules (DRs) and statute: '

1. DR 1-102(A)(3) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation);

2. DR 1-102(A)(4) (conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice);

3. DR 7-102(A)(5) (in lawyer’s representation of a client, knowingly making a false statement of law or fact);

4. DR 5-105(E) (representing multiple current clients when such representation would result in an actual or likely conflict); and

5. ORS 9.527(4) (willful deceit or…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HockettOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  2. In Re JonesOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BootheOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  4. In Re ClaussenOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  5. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of JefferyOregon Supreme Court · 1995

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of KlugeOregon Supreme Court · 2003
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of KlugeOregon Supreme Court · 2001
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BrandtOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Roberts v. FeareyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  5. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of GattiOregon Supreme Court · 2000

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API