In Re Morris
Oregon Supreme Court
1Per curiam
In this lawyer disciplinary proceeding, the Oregon State Bar (the Bar) charges the accused with violating the following disciplinary rules (DRs) and statute: '
1. DR 1-102(A)(3) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation);
2. DR 1-102(A)(4) (conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice);
3. DR 7-102(A)(5) (in lawyer’s representation of a client, knowingly making a false statement of law or fact);
4. DR 5-105(E) (representing multiple current clients when such representation would result in an actual or likely conflict); and
5. ORS 9.527(4) (willful deceit or…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HockettOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- In Re JonesOregon Supreme Court · 1997
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BootheOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- In Re ClaussenOregon Supreme Court · 1996
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of JefferyOregon Supreme Court · 1995
3Cited by12 opinions
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of KlugeOregon Supreme Court · 2003
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of KlugeOregon Supreme Court · 2001
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BrandtOregon Supreme Court · 2000
- Roberts v. FeareyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of GattiOregon Supreme Court · 2000
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.