Legal Opinion

In re Ard

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 2021No. S068497PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

180 Argued and submitted November 3; respondent is suspended from the practice of law for one year, effective 60 days from the date of this decision December 30, 2021 In re Complaint as to the Conduct of MARLIN ARD, OSB No. 931453, Respondent. (OSB 19-93) (SC S068497)

501 P3d 1036

The Oregon State Bar (Bar) alleged that respondent violated Rule of Pro- fessional Conduct (RPC) 8.4(a)(4), which prohibits conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice, by making false certifications in a court filing, initi- ating unwarranted proceedings, and acting improperly in other respects during…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HawsOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Neumann v. LilesOregon Supreme Court · 2016
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of StaufferOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of DavenportOregon Supreme Court · 2002
  5. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of DuggerOregon Supreme Court · 2002

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re ErsoffOregon Supreme Court · 2026
  2. In re MunnOregon Supreme Court · 2024
  3. In re AshtonOregon Supreme Court · 2026
  4. In re AshtonOregon Supreme Court · 2026
  5. In re ErsoffOregon Supreme Court · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API