Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In re Maurer

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 2018No. S064901PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

**191In this lawyer discipline case, the Oregon State Bar charged Steven L. Maurer, a retired judge who is now a practicing lawyer, with violating two disciplinary rules: (1) RPC 1.12(a), which prohibits a lawyer from representing *412a person in connection with a matter in which the lawyer participated personally and substantially as a judge without the informed written consent of all parties; and (2) RPC 8.4(a)(4), which prohibits conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice. A trial panel of the Disciplinary Board conducted a hearing and found that respondent had not committed the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HockettOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of DavenportOregon Supreme Court · 2002
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HostetterOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  4. In Re LawrenceOregon Supreme Court · 2004
  5. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of SanaiOregon Supreme Court · 2016

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In re NisleyOregon Supreme Court · 2019
  2. In re ConryOregon Supreme Court · 2021
  3. In re ArdOregon Supreme Court · 2021
  4. In re Gregory Mark AbelOregon Supreme Court · 2025
  5. In re ErsoffOregon Supreme Court · 2026

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API