Legal Opinion

Grotheer v. Panama-Pacific Land Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 30, 1919No. Civ. No. 2625PublishedCited by 10 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. Geo. E. Crothers, Judge. Affirmed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtRichards, J.

The plaintiff and defendant on October 10, 1910, entered into a contract by" which the latter sold to the former and agreéd to convey to her a lot of land situate within the municipality of Oakland, at the corner of Sunnyvale Avenue and Stanley Road. The price of the lot was $1,580, part of which was paid upon the execution of the agreement, and th® balance thereof was payable in monthly installments.

The agreement contained the following provisions:

“Time is hereby expressly made of the essence of this agreement.
“The seller agrees as follows, viz.:
“ (a) To construct concrete curbing and cement…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Richter v. Union Land & Stock Co.California Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Woodard v. Glenwood Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Sterling v. GregoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Conlin v. OsbornCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Brown v. National Electrics WorksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Dryden v. Board of Pension CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. CasadyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  3. Lasher v. FawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Malavazos v. Irving Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
  5. Frankish v. Federal Mortgage Co.California Court of Appeal · 1939

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API