Legal Opinion

Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. Casady

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 6, 1936No. Civ. 10610PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROTH, J., pro tem.

This is an appeal from a summary judgment entered against defendants in response to a motion based on affidavits, pursuant to section 437c of the Code of Civil Procedure. The pleadings and the affidavits, the latter set forth in a bill of exceptions, present the following facts:

Defendants, on June 3, 1931, executed their joint and several promissory note to plaintiff in the sum of $98,500, in lieu of a note in a similar amount theretofore executed by defendant James N. Casady alone, which latter note had been secured by a pledge of 200 shares of stock of Transamerica…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Zellner v. WassmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Dryden v. Board of Pension CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Hunt v. United Bank & Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Woodard v. Glenwood Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Hunt Bros. Co. v. San Lorenzo Etc. Co.California Supreme Court · 1906

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Eagle Oil & Refining Co. v. PrenticeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Walsh v. WalshCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Kelly v. LiddicoatCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  4. Burke Concrete Accessories, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. Bromberg v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API