Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. Casady
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
ROTH, J., pro tem.
This is an appeal from a summary judgment entered against defendants in response to a motion based on affidavits, pursuant to section 437c of the Code of Civil Procedure. The pleadings and the affidavits, the latter set forth in a bill of exceptions, present the following facts:
Defendants, on June 3, 1931, executed their joint and several promissory note to plaintiff in the sum of $98,500, in lieu of a note in a similar amount theretofore executed by defendant James N. Casady alone, which latter note had been secured by a pledge of 200 shares of stock of Transamerica…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Zellner v. WassmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Dryden v. Board of Pension CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Hunt v. United Bank & Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1930
- Woodard v. Glenwood Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
- Hunt Bros. Co. v. San Lorenzo Etc. Co.California Supreme Court · 1906
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Eagle Oil & Refining Co. v. PrenticeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Walsh v. WalshCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Kelly v. LiddicoatCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Burke Concrete Accessories, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Bromberg v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.