Lasher v. Faw
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
PRESTON,
judgment is affirmed.
This action was brought by plaintiff for the purpose of rescinding a certain agreement of exchange entered into between himself and defendant Faw and to obtain in connection therewith such incidental relief as might be equitable, to wit, reconveyances to him of certain real property; cancellation of certain notes; a money judgment against defendant Murray and all other proper equitable relief. The court made findings and judgment was entered thereon in his favor, from which defendant Cross Investment Company, a corporation, has alone appealed. The facts are…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Lawrence v. GayettyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Richter v. Union Land & Stock Co.California Supreme Court · 1900
- Wooten v. . WaltersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
- Tillaux v. TillauxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Sterling v. GregoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Johnson v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Lobdell v. MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Culjak v. Better Built Homes, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1943
- Fisher v. Nash Building Co.California Court of Appeal · 1952
- Adams v. TalbottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.