Legal Opinion
Dryden v. Board of Pension Commissioners
California Supreme Court
Decided June 23, 1936No. L. A. 15674PublishedCited by 100 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
A hearing was granted in this case after decision by the District Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Division One. Upon further consideration, we are satisfied with the conclusion reached by said court, and we hereby adopt the following opinion of Mr. Justice pro tempore Roth as part of the opinion of this court:
“Petitioner and defendants both filed separate appeals from the judgment in this case in favor of defendants. Pe titioner’s appeal is Civil No. 9912, and the appeal of defendants is Civil No. 10025. Both will be considered together.
“Petitioner is the widow of Claude…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- O'Dea v. CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Woodard v. Glenwood Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
- Aitken v. RocheCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- German-American Sav. Bank v. GollmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Western Salt Co. v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by100 opinions
- In Re Marriage of BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Strumsky v. San Diego County Employees Retirement Assn.California Supreme Court · 1974
- Aryeh v. Canon Business Solutions, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2013
- Kern v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Abbott v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.