Woodard v. Glenwood Lumber Co.
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. W. P. Netherton, and J. L. Johnston, for Appellant I. T. Bloom.
1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.
The defendant, I. T. Bloom, appeals from the judgment and from' an order denying his motion for a new trial.
The action was brought by the plaintiff for the purpose, primarily, of obtaining a decree declaring that the rights of the defendants under a certain contract had terminated. The contract in question was made on the fourteenth day of .November, 1905, between the plaintiff, L. Woodard, as party of the first part, and the defendant, Glenwood Lumber Company, a corporation, as party of the second part. On that date Woodard was the owner of a tract of land in San Mateo County containing four…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Mitau v. RoddanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Bailey v. FoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- McNair & Wade Land Co. v. AdamsSupreme Court of Florida · 1907
- Owen v. Pomona Land and Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1901
- Kennedy v. LeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- See v. North American Accident InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Dryden v. Board of Pension CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Buckhantz v. R. G. Hamilton & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1945
- Crooks v. WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Retsloff v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.