Legal Opinion

Brown v. National Electrics Works

California Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 1914No. L.A. No. 3210PublishedCited by 17 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Flint, Gray & Barker, and Rupert B. Turnbull, for Appellant.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

This is an appeal on the judgment-roll by the plaintiff, from a judgment in favor of the defendant.

The action was to recover the sum of five thousand dollars paid by plaintiff to the defendant in consideration of certain shares of its capital stock and of the agreement by the defendant to employ the plaintiff. The plaintiff claims that the contract was broken and that because of the breach he rescinded the same. The decision of the case depends upon the facts stated in the findings.

In January, 1911, plaintiff and defendant made an agreement whereby the defendant agreed to sell to plaintiff…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pierce v. Tennessee Coal, Iron & RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  2. Brown v. Crown Gold Milling Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Harrington v. Kansas City Cable Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1895
  4. Davidson v. LaughlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Speegle v. Board of Fire UnderwritersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Wilson v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  3. J. C. Millett Co. v. Park & Tilford Distillers Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 1954
  4. Boehm v. SpreckelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Millsap v. National Funding Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1943

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API