Legal Opinion

Conlin v. Osborn

California Supreme Court

Decided December 27, 1911No. S.F. No. 5567PublishedCited by 22 opinions

'APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from orders denying a motion to set aside the verdict, and denying a new trial. John Hunt, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment against him, from the order denying his motion to set aside the verdict before entry of judgment and from an order denying his motion for a new trial.

The action was one for the recovery of ten thousand dollars paid as a deposit on account of a contract of sale of real property situate in the city and County of San Francisco. Plaintiff negotiated with Sage, Dealey & Co., a corporation, which was defendant’s agent, for the purchase of a piece of land and the improvements thereon located on Hayes Street near Van Ness Avenue. On April 16, 1906, a written contract…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Wells v. CalnanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
  2. Boyson v. ThornCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. J. S. Potts Drug Co. v. BenedictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Brewer v. HerbertCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1869
  5. Smith v. Phœnix InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Krobitzsch v. MiddletonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  2. Capital Savings & Loan Ass'n v. ConveyWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Ogren v. Inner Harbor Land Co.California Court of Appeal · 1927
  4. Cooper v. HuntingtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Grotheer v. Panama-Pacific Land Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API