Legal Opinion

Frankish v. Federal Mortgage Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 7, 1939No. Civ. 2168PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.

—This is an action to cancel a trust deed and note. Respondent, a widow, was the owner of certain real property, subject to a mortgage of $1535.29, located in the city of Ontario, San Bernardino County. Parcel 1 was an unimproved city block. Parcel 2 consisted of a lot which was improved with a store building and under lease by paying tenants at a monthly rental of $100. Both parcels were valuable properties. It appeared that respondent was willing to sell these properties to avoid the cares of rental, upkeep, and the like, and to transform the vacant block into securities that would return…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Victor Oil Co. v. DrumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Utah Construction Co. v. Western Pacific Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Domenigoni v. Imperial Live Stock & Mortgage Co.California Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Williams v. HasshagenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Bailey v. FoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Merrill v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Hansen v. G & G TRUCKING CO.California Court of Appeal · 1965
  3. Peterson v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  4. LeClercq v. MichaelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. Crowley v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API