Eaton Manufacturing Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Richardson, Judge:
The ultimate question here presented for our determination in eight (8) protest cases which have been consolidated for trial is the proper classification of certain marine engines and out-drives which were manufactured by Volvo Penta, exported from Sweden, and entered at the ports of Seattle and New York. The merchandise of protest 65/13083, entered at Seattle under entry 19511, consists of marine engines and outdrives which were appraised as separate entities and then classified in liquidation as such under TSUS items 660.44 (internal combustion engines) and 696.15 (parts…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- National Carloading Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
- Heemsoth Kerner Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953
- Andrew Dossett Imp., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
- Asam Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956
3Cited by5 opinions
- Eaton Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
- United States v. Howard Hartry, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
- Howard Hartry, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
- Eaton Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1974
- Pistorino & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972