Legal Opinion

Andrew Dossett Imp., Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided October 18, 1967No. C.D. 3167PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Richaedson, Judge:

The merchandise of this protest consists of certain boats described on the invoices as 8, 9, 10, and 12 foot motor boats, which were manufactured in and exported from England by Avon Rubber Company, Ltd. and entered at Los Angeles, Calif., by the plaintiff importer. The boats were classified in liquidation under item 696.35 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States, hereinafter referred to as TSUS, as “Pneumatic craft” and assessed for duty at 12.5 per centum ad valorem. The importer claims that the boats should be classified under item 696.05 of TSUS as “pleasure boats”…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Holmes v. Phenix Ins. Co. of BrooklynCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1899
  2. Healthway's, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Eaton Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
  2. Andrew Dossett Imports, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  3. Newman Imp. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  4. Newman Importing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  5. World Famous Sales Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API