Legal Opinion

Heemsoth Kerner Corp. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided November 5, 1953No. C. D. 1554PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Eicwall, Judge:

This case is before us on a motion to amend the pleading, filed by the plaintiff. Defendant has filed objections to the motion and also filed a cross-motion to dismiss the original pleading on the ground that it does not raise a question over which this court, sitting in classification, has jurisdiction, under section 514 of the Tariff Act of 1930.

The merchandise covered by the involved entry consists of 1,190 drums of caustic soda imported from England. As indicated by the official papers, the drums were assessed at the rate of 12% per centum ad valorem under paragraph 328 of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. PassavantSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. United States v. Tampa Box Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  3. T. S. Kennedy Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1939
  4. Ludlow Manufacturing & Sales Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1948
  5. Phil. B. Bekeart Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1944

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Pistorino & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
  2. Import Export Service v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
  3. Eaton Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
  4. Parmentier's Roses v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
  5. Nanco, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API