National Carloading Corp. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Rao, Judge:
This is a motion for leave to amend the protest in the above-entitled action to insert the following claims:
We claim that the cards are the usual containers for the needles and needle threaders and that the cost of these containers should be prorated between needles and the needle threader.
Counsel for the defendant has indorsed upon the moving papers the statement that there is no objection on his part to the granting of this motion.
The alleged protest to which the instant motion is addressed is in the form of a letter to the collector of customs at the port of San Francisco, on…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Arthur v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Schell's Executors v. FauchéSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Greely's Administrator v. BurgessSupreme Court of the United States · 1856
- Herrman v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
3Cited by15 opinions
- Torch Mfg. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
- J. R. Press Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
- Eaton Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
- Atlantic Linen Importing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964
- How-Tex Peanut Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.