Pistorino & Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Dissent
DISSENTING OPINION
Rioiiaedson, Judge:
In view of the unorthodox description of merchandise set forth in the original protest filed by the plaintiff-consignee-broker (expressed in terms of stated values rather than in terms of the conventional identification of articles), compounded by statements appearing in the official papers to which the court must turn for intelligent understanding of the protest claims,1 a jurisdictional question arising from the face of the pleading is presented to the court at the outset. It seems clear that the $9,588 figure mentioned in the protest relates to the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Greely's Administrator v. BurgessSupreme Court of the United States · 1856
- Herrman v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Heemsoth Kerner Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953
- J. R. Press Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
- Eaton Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.