Legal Opinion

Howard Hartry, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided October 21, 1971No. C.D. 4286PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KiohakdsoN, Judge:

The merchandise of this protest consists of articles described on the commercial invoice as AlbiN Marine Diesel Engine type AD-2, with reverse gear, reduction gear 2:1. The merchandise was classified in liquidation as parts of yachts or pleasure boats under item 696.15 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States at the duty rate of 12 per centum ad valorem.

Under this protest plaintiff contends that the merchandise should be classified as compression ignition engines under item 660.42, TSUS, at the duty rate of 10 per centum ad valorem. At the trial held on January 28, 1970,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. OuterbridgeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
  2. Eaton Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. Howard Hartry, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
  2. Howard Hartry, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API