Eaton Manufacturing Co. v. United States
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Lane, Judge.
These appeals are from the decision and judgment of the Customs Court, 66 Cust. Ct. 293, C.D. 4207 (1971), dismissing four protests and sustaining other protests to the classification of certain goods following a consolidated trial of all the protests. In Appeal No. 5476, appellants (hereinafter referred to as Eaton) assert that the Customs Court committed reversible-error in dismissing the protests for insufficiency and lack of a justiciable issue. We agree and, accordingly, reverse and remand. In Appeal No. 5478, the Government contends that the original classification of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- The ConquerorSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Davies v. ArthurSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- United States v. Sheldon & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
- Border Brokerage Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Computime, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Parksmith Corp.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1975
- XL Specialty Insurance v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2004
- United States v. Wedemann & Godknecht, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1975
- United States v. Howard Hartry, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.