Legal Opinion
In Re Uchendu
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided December 19, 2002No. 01-BG-1579PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GLICKMAN, Associate J.:
The Board on Professional Responsibility recommends that the respondent Vincent C. Uchendu be suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia for thirty days. . The Board found that respondent violated Rules 3.3(a), 8.4(c), and 8.4(d) of the District of Columbia Rules of Professional Conduct by signing his clients’ names on documents filed with the Probate Division of the District of Columbia Superior Court and by notarizing some of his own signatures on these documents. We accept the Board’s findings that respondent made false statements to the court in…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- In Re RebackDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
- In Re TempleDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- In Re SchneiderDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
- In Re RebackDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- In Re HopkinsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- In re MartinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
- In Re EvansDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
- In re VohraDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
- In re Stephen T.YelvertonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
- In Re WhiteDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.