Legal Opinion
In Re Temple
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided August 12, 1993No. 90-SP-297PublishedCited by 57 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WAGNER, Associate Judge:
This disciplinary matter is before the court for the second time. In the prior case, we accepted the conclusion of the Board on Professional Responsibility (the Board) that respondent, William J. Temple, had violated multiple disciplinary rules and that the appropriate sanction for his misconduct would be disbarment, unless mitigating circumstances warranted otherwise. In re Temple, 596 A.2d 585, 586-88 (D.C.1991) (Temple I). 1 We also adopted the Board’s determination that Temple had met his burden of showing by a preponderance of the evidence that his professional…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Matter of AddamsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- In re S.G.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- In Re KerseyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Matter of HauptDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
- In Re MicheelDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- In Re AndersonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
- In Re Cleaver-BascombeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
- In re MartinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
- In Re Cleaver-BascombeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- In Re FairDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.