Legal Opinion
In Re White
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided January 20, 2011No. 09-BG-1012, 10-BG-795PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Per curiam
The Board on Professional Responsibility has filed two separate reports and recommendations with this court concerning respondent, Lucille Saundra White, arising from separate matters that occurred during the same period. In its first report, issued on August 20, 2009, the Board recommended that respondent be suspended for six months and be required to demonstrate fitness as a condition for reinstatement for violating Rule 1.11 of the District of Columbia Rules of Professional Conduct (conflict in successive government and private employment). Respondent filed exception to that report and…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- In Re RebackDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
- In Re HutchinsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- In Re RoundtreeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- In Re GoffeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- In Re MicheelDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Miller v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
- In re SamadDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
- In re Stephen T.YelvertonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
- In re Laurence F. JohnsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017
- In re OmwengaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.