Legal Opinion
In Re Evans
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided April 27, 2006No. 05-BG-538PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Per curiam
In this uncontested case, the Board on Professional Responsibility (“Board”) has found that respondent Dorsey Evans violated Rules 1.1(a) (competent representation), 1.1(b) (skill and care), 1.7(b)(4) (conflict of interest), and 8.4(d) (conduct that seriously interferes with the administration of justice). This court will accept the Board’s findings as long as they are supported by substantial evidence in the record. D.C. Bar R. XI, § 9(g)(1). We find substantial support in the record for the Board’s findings, and accordingly, we accept them.
We append the Board’s thorough and instructive…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- In Re DelaneyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- In Re HutchinsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- In Re MicheelDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- In Re AndersonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
- Matter of ShorterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- In Re ElginDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- In Re GubermanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- In re Stephen T.YelvertonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
- In Re Olekanma A. Ekekwe-KauffmanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2019
- In Re WhiteDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.