Legal Opinion
In Re Reback
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided January 31, 1985No. 83-1289PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Per curiam
In this disciplinary matter, attorneys William Reback and Charles C. Parsons contest the Report and Recommendations of the Board on Professional Responsibility. A majority of the Board concluded that the attorneys had each violated several provisions of the Code of Professional Responsibility. The Board majority recommended that both be suspended, Reback for a year and a day and Parsons for 30 days. We reject one of the Board’s findings of violation by Reback and partially disagree with the Board’s recommendation as to sanction, ordering instead that both attorneys be suspended for a year and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Matter of HauptDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
- Matter of SmithDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Matter of KeilerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
- Matter of WillcherDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Matter of FogelDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- In Re RebackDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
- Matter of ShorterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- In Re HopkinsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. KupecWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
- In Re ElginDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.