Legal Opinion

In re Vohra

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided June 27, 2013No. 11-BG-1607PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BELSON, Senior Judge:

This matter comes before us upon the Report and Recommendation of the Board on Professional Responsibility (“Board”). The Board concluded that respondent Robert N. Vohra committed thirteen violations of the Rules of Professional Conduct (“Rules” or “Rule”) in a single immigration matter involving the obtaining of visas for a married couple. Respondent’s misconduct included sustained neglect of his clients’ matters and numerous Rule violations, some involving dishonesty. The Board unanimously recommended that respondent be suspended for three years and be required to…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. In Re RebackDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. In Re HutchinsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. In Re RoundtreeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. In Re GoffeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. In Re MicheelDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. In Re Olekanma A. Ekekwe-KauffmanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2019
  2. Commonwealth v. WrightSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. In re McClureDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. In re Rodriguez-QuesadaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. In re PetersDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API