Legal Opinion

In Re Reback

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided July 31, 1986No. 83-1289PublishedCited by 161 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BELSON, Associate Judge:

In this Bar discipline matter, we granted the respondent attorneys’ petition for rehearing en banc and vacated the opinion of a division of this court suspending the attorneys from the practice of law for a year and a day. In re Reback and Parsons, 487 A.2d 235 (2-1 decision), vacated, 492 A.2d 267 (D.C.1985). The en banc court agrees with the division’s unanimous holding concerning the respondents’ alleged violations of certain disciplinary rules, but disagrees with the division majority’s holding concerning sanction. Instead, we order both Reback and Parsons…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. In Re RuffaloSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Matter of HauptDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Matter of SmithDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. In Re RebackDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Matter of KeilerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by161 opinions

  1. Matter of AddamsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. In Re HutchinsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Wallace v. Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & FlomDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. In Re GoffeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. In Re MicheelDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992

156 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API