Legal Opinion
In Re Schneider
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided January 24, 1989No. 86-21PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEADMAN, Associate Judge:
In this disciplinary case, we are called upon to deal with the question of the imposition of sanction upon a member of the bar who, without intent of personal gain, engages in action involving alteration of documents; viz., eight credit card receipts submitted for travel expense reimbursement.
I. The Facts.
While a first-year associate with the law firm he had joined upon graduation from law school,1 respondent Schneider submitted false travel expense reports to this firm on eight separate occasions over a seven-month period in 1981. Specifically, Schneider altered…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- In Re RebackDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
- In Re HutchinsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Matter of HauptDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
- In Re HarrisonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- Matter of JamesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Matter of AddamsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- In Re GoffeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Association v. KinseySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
- In Re Cleaver-BascombeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
- In re MartinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.