In the Interest of K.M.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SUE WALKER, Justice.
I.Introduction
In this case, we must decide whether the procedures set forth in Anders v. California1 apply to appeals in parental rights termination cases when counsel is appointed. We hold that the Anders procedures do apply, and accordingly, we abate this case and remand it to the trial court for a hearing to determine whether all available steps have been taken to inform Appellant Christina Fields of her counsel’s conclusion that her appeal is without merit and of her right to review the record and file a pro se brief.
II.Factual and Procedural Background
The trial…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- McCoy v. Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, District 1Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- In re D.A.S.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
- In the Interest of AWT, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2001
- In the Interest of E.L.Y.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2002
3Cited by200 opinions
- Taylor v. Texas Department of Protective & Regulatory Services, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2005
- in the Interest Of: K.D., S.D. & J.R., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2003
- In the Interest of D.D.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2009
- in the Interest of C.J., H.T., and B.T., ChildrenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
- In the Interest of K.R.C., Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2009
195 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.