Legal Opinion
In the Interest of D.D.
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided February 23, 2009No. 05-08-00001-CVPublishedCited by 127 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by
Justice WRIGHT.
Mother appeals from the trial court’s order terminating her parental rights to her three children. Mother is represented on appeal by court-appointed counsel who has filed an Anders brief on her behalf concluding that, after thorough review of the record, Mother’s appeal of the termination of her parental rights is frivolous and without merit. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).
This Court has not previously addressed the propriety of filing an Anders *850brief in a parental rights termination case. However, eight of our…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Bledsoe v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
- Taylor v. Texas Department of Protective & Regulatory Services, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2005
- In the Interest of K.M.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2003
- In the Interest of AWT, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by127 opinions
- in the Interest of C.J., H.T., and B.T., ChildrenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
- in the Interest of G.P., a Child, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2016
- In Re DD, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2009
- In the Interest of A.A. and L.A., Children v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2024
- In the Interest of A.E., a Child v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2025
122 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.