Legal Opinion
In the Interest of K.R.C.
Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)
Decided April 16, 2009No. 08-08-00161-CVPublishedCited by 64 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVID WELLINGTON CHEW, Chief Justice.
M.R.C. appeals from a judgment terminating her parental rights. We affirm.
M.R.C. is represented on appeal by court appointed counsel who has filed a brief in accordance with the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 741-44, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 1398-1400, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Court appointed counsel has concluded that after a thorough review of the record, M.R.C.’s appeal is frivolous and without merit. In Anders, the Supreme Court recognized that counsel, though appointed to represent the appellant in an appeal from a criminal conviction,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- High v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Taylor v. Texas Department of Protective & Regulatory Services, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2005
- In the Interest of K.M.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2003
- In the Interest of AWT, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- in the Interest of C.J., H.T., and B.T., ChildrenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
- in the Interest of S. P., a Child, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2016
- In re Interest of D.C.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2019
- In the INTEREST OF A.F. and I.F., Children, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2015
- In the Interest of A.B., a Child v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2025
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.