Anders v. California
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Clark
We are here concerned with the extent of the duty of a court-appointed appellate counsel to prosecute a first appeal from a criminal conviction, after that attorney has conscientiously determined that there is no merit to the indigent’s appeal.
After he was convicted of the felony of possession of marijuana, petitioner sought to appeal and moved that the California District Court of Appeal appoint counsel for him. Such motion was granted; however, after a study of the record and consultation with petitioner, the appointed counsel concluded that there was no merit to the appeal. He so advised…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Lane v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57,891 opinions
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Penson v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- High v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Jones v. BarnesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Bledsoe v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
57,886 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.