Legal Opinion

In the Interest of E.L.Y.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 27, 2002No. 10-01-180-CVPublishedCited by 119 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

2Per curiam

A jury recommended that Roxanne Yo-vanovitch’s parental rights be terminated with respect to her two-year-old daughter E.L.Y. The court rendered judgment in accordance with the verdict, and Yovano-vitch appealed.

Yovanovitch’s counsel has tendered a document entitled a “Memorandum Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967) and Motion to Withdraw as Attorney on Appeal.” This Court has never addressed the issue of whether our Anders procedures for frivolous appeals should apply in an appeal from a decree of involuntary termination of parental…

3Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. High v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
  3. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Pennsylvania v. FinleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by119 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Texas Department of Protective & Regulatory Services, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2005
  2. In the Interest of K.M.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2003
  3. in the Interest Of: K.D., S.D. & J.R., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2003
  4. In the Interest of D.D.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2009
  5. In the Interest of T.N.F.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2006

114 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API