Legal Opinion

In re D.A.S.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 3, 1998No. Nos. 97-1007, 97-1008PublishedCited by 311 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOwen, Justice

PHILLIPS, Chief Justice, GONZALEZ, HECHT, SPECTOR and ABBOTT, Justices, join.

In these two related mandamus proceedings, we consider whether the procedure set forth in Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), applies to appeals from juvenile delinquency adjudications. We conclude that it does and conditionally grant mandamus relief in both cases.

The district court found D.A.S. to be a child engaged in delinquent conduct for committing the offense of aggravated assault. The court committed D.A.S. to the Texas Youth Commission for a period of twenty years, with a…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  3. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Gainous v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1969
  5. Pennsylvania v. FinleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by311 opinions

  1. in the Interest of P.M., a ChildTexas Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Taylor v. Texas Department of Protective & Regulatory Services, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2005
  3. In the Interest of K.M.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2003
  4. in the Interest Of: K.D., S.D. & J.R., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2003
  5. In the INTEREST OF A.M. & A.M., ChildrenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016

306 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API