Legal Opinion

in the Interest Of: K.D., S.D. & J.R.

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided September 25, 2003No. 01-02-00550-CVPublishedCited by 143 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SAM NUCHIA, Justice.

After a four-day jury trial, the jury found that the parental rights of appellant, Katherine Rochester, to her three minor children should be terminated. The trial court rendered a final order terminating appellant’s parental rights, and appellant appeals that order. We affirm.

Appellant’s court-appointed appellate counsel filed a brief concluding that there is no non-frivolous issue that could be presented on appeal and that any appeal would be without merit. Although Texas courts of appeals in Corpus Christi, Fort Worth, Austin, Waco, Amarillo, and Tyler have…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Ex Parte WilsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  3. In re D.A.S.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Stephens v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2000
  5. In the Interest of K.M.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by143 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Texas Department of Protective & Regulatory Services, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2005
  2. In the Interest of D.D.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2009
  3. In the INTEREST OF A.M. & A.M., ChildrenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
  4. In the Interest of K.R.C., Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2009
  5. in the Interest of L.D.T., C.R.E.T. and W.G.T., Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2005

138 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API