In the Interest of AWT
Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)
1Per curiam
Jerry Wayne Todd appeals from an order terminating the parental relationship between himself and his children AWT, MGT and JKT. The trial court appointed Todd counsel to represent him on appeal. Thereafter, his appointed counsel filed an Anders 1 brief and motion to withdraw. 2 In the brief, appellate counsel certified that he 1) diligently reviewed the appellate record and 2) concluded the appeal was merit-less. So too did counsel state that he informed his client, Todd, of his conclusion and of Todd’s right to review the record and file a pro se response to the brief and motion. This court…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Tong v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Allred v. Harris County Child Welfare UnitCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
- In the Interest J.M.S.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2001
3Cited by184 opinions
- In the Interest of K.M.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2003
- in the Interest Of: K.D., S.D. & J.R., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2003
- In the Interest of D.D.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2009
- In the Interest of E.L.Y.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2002
- In the Interest of T.N.F.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2006
179 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.