Legal Opinion

In the Interest of AWT

Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)

Decided September 20, 2001No. 07-00-0264-CVPublishedCited by 184 opinions

1Per curiam

Jerry Wayne Todd appeals from an order terminating the parental relationship between himself and his children AWT, MGT and JKT. The trial court appointed Todd counsel to represent him on appeal. Thereafter, his appointed counsel filed an Anders 1 brief and motion to withdraw. 2 In the brief, appellate counsel certified that he 1) diligently reviewed the appellate record and 2) concluded the appeal was merit-less. So too did counsel state that he informed his client, Todd, of his conclusion and of Todd’s right to review the record and file a pro se response to the brief and motion. This court…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Tong v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  3. Allred v. Harris County Child Welfare UnitCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
  4. In the Interest J.M.S.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2001

3Cited by184 opinions

  1. In the Interest of K.M.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2003
  2. in the Interest Of: K.D., S.D. & J.R., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2003
  3. In the Interest of D.D.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2009
  4. In the Interest of E.L.Y.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2002
  5. In the Interest of T.N.F.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2006

179 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API