Hartford-Empire Co. v. Glenshaw Glass Co.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
SCHOONMAKER, District Judge.
Plaintiff has addressed fifty-one interrogatories to the defendant in this case for answer under the provisions of Rule 33 of the Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c. It may be noted that interrogatory 1 has twenty-eight subdivisions.
*211We have held, in considering interrogatories under this rule, that they should be relatively few and related to the important facts of the case. See Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. James B. Berry Sons Co., D.C., 1 F.R.D. 163, 165; Stewart-Warner Corporation v. Staley, D.C., 2 F.R.D. 199, 200; Knox v. Alter, D.C., 2…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Coca Cola Co. v. Dixi-Cola Laboratories, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1939
- United States v. Hartford-Empire Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1942
- Stewart-Warner Corp. v. StaleyDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1941
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Corp. v. James B. Berry Sons Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1940
- Knox v. AlterDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1942
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cinema Amusements, Inc. v. Loew's, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1947
- Porter v. Montaldo'sDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1946
- Stovall v. Gulf & South American Steamship Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1961
- Bush v. SkidisDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1948
- Krantz v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1972
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.