Legal Opinion

Stovall v. Gulf & South American Steamship Co.

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided January 26, 1961No. Civ. A. No. 12988PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

INGRAHAM, District Judge.

Defendants Phillips Chemical Company and Phillips Terminal Company object to these interrogatories propounded by plaintiff under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 33, 28 U.S.C.A.: 22, 23, 28, *15430, 32, 33, 34, 38, 39, 40, 43, 44, 48 and 49.

The production of statements of witnesses and other documents may not be required in answer to interrogatories under Rule 33. Such documents are obtainable only pursuant to Rule 34, which rule requires a preliminary showing of “good cause”. (A request to describe in detail and give the contents of documents and statements is equivalent to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Alltmont v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
  2. Lewis v. United Air Lines Transport CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1940
  3. Goldner v. Chicago & N. W. Ry. SystemDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1952
  4. Harvey v. LevineDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1960
  5. United States v. Certain Parcels of Land in City & County of San FranciscoDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1959

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Zaentz v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1979
  2. Rosado v. Tribunal Superior de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1967
  3. Scuderi v. Boston InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1964
  4. Greene v. RaymondDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1966
  5. Uinta Oil Refining Company v. Continental Oil CompanyDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1964

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API