Stewart-Warner Corp. v. Staley
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
SCHOONMAKER, District Judge.
The plaintiff filed a motion for a bill of particulars as to the matters alleged in the counterclaim. To this the defendant responded' by filing a bill of particulars on January 12, 1941, and a further amended counterclaim on April 1, 1941. In these we believe defendant has alleged its counterclaim with sufficient particularity. This motion will therefore be denied.
The interrogatories to which plaintiff objected we find are thirty-three in number, and relate largely to matters that could more properly and conveniently be inquired into by oral examination. We…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Coca Cola Co. v. Dixi-Cola Laboratories, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1939
- Byers Theaters, Inc. v. MurphyDistrict Court, D. West Virginia · 1940
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Corp. v. James B. Berry Sons Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1940
3Cited by10 opinions
- Perlman v. FeldmannDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1953
- Canuso v. City of Niagara FallsDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1945
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Radio Corp. of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1952
- United States v. Columbia Steel Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1947
- Ball v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1944
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.