Legal Opinion
United States v. Hartford-Empire Co.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided August 25, 1942No. 4426PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KLOEB, District Judge.
This is a civil action initiated by the Government of the United States under the antitrust laws — sections 1, 2 and 4 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C.A. §§ 1, 2, 4, and section 3 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C.A. § 14. The complaint was filed on December 11, 1939.
Sections 1 and 2 of the Act of July 2, 1890, 26 Stat. 209, 15 U.S.C.A. §§ 1, 2, commonly referred to as the Sherman Anti-Trust Act, as amended by the Act of August 17, 1937, 50 Stat. 693, provide in part, as follows:
Sec. 1. “Every contract, combination in the form of trust or otherwise, or conspiracy, in restraint…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Morton Salt Co. v. G. S. Suppiger Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Motion Picture Patents Co. v. Universal Film Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
- United States v. American Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- United States v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Therasense, Inc. v. Becton, Dickinson and Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Hartford-Empire Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- United States v. National Lead Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1945
- United States v. General Electric Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1949
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.