Legal Opinion

Graver Tank & Mfg. Corp. v. James B. Berry Sons Co.

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided February 8, 1940No. 13PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHOONMAKER, District Judge.

Defendant has filed interrogatories under Rule 33 of the Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c. Plaintiff has filed objection to answering certain of them, on the ground that the answers would not be material or relevant to any of the issues raised by the allegations of the complaint. The defendant has filed no answer, so we shall be unable to determine the precise relevancy of any of the matters inquired about, so far as concerns any defense the defendant may have to the plaintiff’s cause of action, as stated in its complaint.

The plaintiff…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Coca Cola Co. v. Dixi-Cola Laboratories, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1939

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Byers Theaters, Inc. v. MurphyDistrict Court, D. West Virginia · 1940
  2. Canuso v. City of Niagara FallsDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1945
  3. Stewart-Warner Corp. v. StaleyDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1941
  4. Ball v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1944
  5. Hartford-Empire Co. v. Glenshaw Glass Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1943

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API